home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: ns.mad.servicom.es!news
- From: ores@mad.servicom.es (Orestes Sanchez)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: Coding Standards
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1996 22:50:18 GMT
- Organization: SERVICOM
- Message-ID: <4j9stg$ers@ns.mad.servicom.es>
- References: <4hj8ek$elu@sam.inforamp.net> <4hktar$5o2@galaxy.ucr.edu> <4hmqol$97j@abacus.abasoft.co.uk> <4hsg8r$pmm@sam.inforamp.net> <4i9o6j$p4l@daisy.pgh.wec.com> <4idskb$pc1@sam.inforamp.net> <314EBD08.43BC@virtus.com> <4io2i7$n9v@sam.inforamp.net> <4iuu6k$6a6@druid.borland.com> <31535E8E.298F@nando.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp_mad_74.inf.servicom.es
- X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
-
- Caius Martius <caius@nando.net> wrote:
-
-
- >I couldn't agree more. I do not subscribe to the idea that "I understand
- >my code, who cares if anyone else does." Trust me, if you pick up a
- >piece of code you wrote 3 years ago, it will take you a while to figure
- >out what you were talking about.
-
- I completely agree.
- I am a two-year experience programmer and for that time I am debugging
- code made by other people. And it is really awfull!!! There is code
- documented, the notation for variables is arbitrarius, the names of
- the variables are choosen with the *sh, ...
- When I write new code embeded into the old one I can quickly recognize
- it.
-
-
-
-
-